The shared tear: A story

The old banyan tree in the village square was Maya’s secret keeper. Every afternoon, after school, she'd sit beneath its sprawling branches, feeling the quiet hum of the village around her. It wasn't just the sounds of laughter or the distant clanging of a blacksmith's hammer; it was something deeper, a feeling of shared breath.

One day, a harsh drought struck. The fields cracked, the well ran dry, and the vibrant laughter in the square faded into worried whispers. Maya saw her mother’s tired eyes, her father’s furrowed brow. A heavy sadness settled over the village, and it settled in Maya’s own heart too. It was as if every tear, every fear, was a drop in a giant, invisible pool that everyone drank from. She felt the collective despair as keenly as her own hunger.

Then, one evening, an elder suggested a village prayer under the banyan tree. As everyone gathered, their voices, normally individual, merged into a single, hopeful chant. Maya closed her eyes. She felt not just her own hope, but the concentrated hope of every person present. It was a warmth, a gentle pressure, a knowing that they were all wishing for the same thing, together. That night, a soft drizzle began, slowly turning into a steady rain. Maya knew it wasn't just a coincidence. It was the universe responding to their collective spirit, a testament to the powerful, unspoken connection that bound them all. The banyan tree seemed to sigh with relief, just like everyone else.

The Shared Mind: A Psychological View of Collective Consciousness

The concept of collective consciousness, first introduced by sociologist Émile Durkheim, has a profound psychological dimension. While often viewed as a purely social phenomenon, it can be understood as the psychological bedrock upon which a society's norms, values, and beliefs are built. From a psychological perspective, it is not a mystical entity but rather an emergent property of shared human cognition, social interaction, and emotional resonance.

At its core, collective consciousness is about shared mental representations. Humans are inherently social creatures, and our minds are wired to seek connection and conformity. When we interact within a group—be it a family, a community, or a nation—our individual thoughts and feelings begin to align. This process is driven by several key psychological mechanisms.

Firstly, there is social learning and modeling. From a young age, we observe and imitate the behaviors, beliefs, and emotional responses of those around us. This is how we internalize the unwritten rules of our culture. We learn what is considered "normal" or "acceptable," and these mental scripts form a shared framework for social interaction.

Secondly, emotional contagion plays a vital role. This is the phenomenon where a person's emotions and related behaviors trigger similar emotions in others. Think of the powerful, unifying feelings at a national sports event or the shared grief during a collective tragedy. These emotional experiences are not just individual; they are contagious, creating a powerful sense of unity and shared identity. This shared emotional state reinforces a group’s sense of solidarity and purpose.

Furthermore, cognitive biases contribute significantly. The conformity bias, for example, is our tendency to adopt the behaviors or opinions of the group to fit in and feel accepted. The groupthink phenomenon, a more extreme form of this, shows how a desire for harmony or conformity can lead to irrational or dysfunctional decision-making. These psychological biases help explain why shared beliefs—even those lacking individual critical thought—can become so deeply entrenched and difficult to challenge.

In modern, diverse societies, collective consciousness is not a single, monolithic entity. Instead, it is a complex tapestry of various sub-groups with their own shared beliefs and values. This can lead to both harmony and conflict. When the values of different groups clash, social tension can rise. However, when shared values—such as a commitment to justice, freedom, or community—emerge, they can become a powerful force for social cohesion and positive change.

Ultimately, the psychological perspective on collective consciousness reveals it as a dynamic, evolving construct rooted in our innate need for belonging, our capacity for empathy, and the powerful influence of social environments on our individual minds. It is the "social mind" that guides our behavior, shapes our identity, and connects us to the larger human narrative.

​"Selfie mania has vanished picture era"

​

In the grand tapestry of human expression, few inventions have been as transformative as the camera. For over a century, photography was a deliberate art form, a meticulous process of capturing moments. Families gathered for portraits, landscapes were meticulously framed, and events were documented with a sense of permanence and purpose. This was the "picture era," a time when a photograph was a treasured object, often printed, placed in an album, and passed down through generations. But with the advent of the smartphone and the cultural phenomenon of the "selfie," that era appears to have vanished.

​The selfie is not merely a self-portrait; it's a completely new genre of visual communication. It is born of a culture of instant gratification and constant self-documentation, fueled by the relentless engine of social media. The traditional photograph was about capturing a moment—a place, a person, an event—for posterity. The selfie, by contrast, is often about capturing the self in a moment, an act of performance and self-presentation. It's less about the scene and more about the subject.

​The rise of the selfie has fundamentally altered our relationship with the camera. No longer a tool for objective observation, the camera has become a mirror. We curate our online identities through a stream of perfectly angled, filtered, and often retouched self-portraits. This shift has had a profound impact. The focus has moved from the world around us to the face in the frame. We take pictures not to remember a beautiful sunset, but to show that we were there to witness it. The emphasis is on our presence, our experience, and our perceived appearance.

​This constant self-curation has led to a devaluation of the photograph as a historical artifact. While a family photo from the 1980s tells a story of an era, complete with awkward poses and genuine smiles, a modern digital gallery is often a collection of individual performances. The candid, spontaneous shot has been replaced by the meticulously staged selfie. The act of taking a picture has shifted from a shared experience to an individual one, even when others are present. The group selfie, for example, is often a series of individual portraits taken within a collective setting, each person more concerned with their own expression than with the collective moment.

​In this new "selfie mania," the traditional picture has not been eliminated, but it has certainly been pushed to the sidelines. The picture era was about a shared memory; the selfie era is about a personal brand. It's a shift from documentation to performance, from observation to self-obsession. While the camera remains a powerful tool, its primary purpose for many has changed from a window on the world to a reflection of the self. The art of capturing a genuine, unadulterated moment has been overshadowed by the desire to present a perfected, filtered version of ourselves, and in doing so, the very essence of what a "picture" once was has been lost to the digital tide.